Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Ada County, DeWayne Shedd, Josh Dewalt and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helburn v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2019cv00476
Defendant:
Al Ramirez and Multiple John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Office of the Governor, State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Dennis James, Peace Officer's Standard and Training Council, Idaho, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Ada County, Cassia County, Idaho Commission on Pardons and Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith, Jr, Dora K Hill and Dana Lydell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Yordy et al
as 1:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Jay Christenson, Corizon LLC, Keith Yordy and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. Yordy et al
as 1:2018cv00292
Defendant:
Borg, A Weed, Lau and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does and Faron R. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Idaho Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Idaho Board of Corrections, Keith Yordy, Christianson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
