Cases 31 - 40 of 204
Smith v. Thrasher
as 3:2022cv01828
Petitioner:
J. Garrett Smith
Respondent:
Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Cain
as 2:2022cv01819
Petitioner:
Victor D. Smith
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 3:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
Jammie T. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Alexander, Jeffery Wheeler and T. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Prins et al
as 6:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Craig Prins, C/O Drumonet, C/O K. Engles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahueron v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Allieanna Charleyn Mahueron
Defendant:
J. Miller, Lt. Kenyon, Lt. Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeGruy v. Rjork et al
as 6:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Omari Lateef DeGruy
Defendant:
Rjork, Justin and Eric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Donovan Farley
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Does 2 through 5 and Cameron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.A. v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
D. A.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Josh Highberger, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
