Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Wilson v. Archer et al
as 2:2012cv01082
Defendant:
Sgt. Archer, Mr. Deacon, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Earl Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marson v. Multnomah County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2011cv01505
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Wesley Marson
Defendant:
Multnomah County Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon, Craig Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USA
as 3:2011cv70020
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rochester v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv00616
Defendant:
Michael L. Abston, J. Aldrick, Tamara L. Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester v. Sanford et al
as 3:2011cv00471
Defendant:
Abston, Nikkie Haley, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2011cv06105
Defendant:
Darcey Baker, Ronald Brown, Michael T. Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piatt v. Nooth et al
as 3:2010cv00932
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Mark Nooth, L. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Piatt
Debtor:
F. Serrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Lennie T. Davidson
Defendant:
A. Nelson, Counselor Ruffcorn, Schutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Wilson et al
as 3:2010cv00253
Respondent:
Assistant Chief Greg Clark, Debra Hassell, P. Hoeye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey v. Hall et al
as 1:2009cv01529
Respondent:
Jane Doe(s), John Doe(s), Guy Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
