Cases 61 - 70 of 2,146
Sawyer et al v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kent Sawyer and Sandra Lynn Short
Defendant:
Deschutes County, L. Shane Nelson, Michael Schults and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
Tim Jackson
Respondent:
J. Hill and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Troyer et al
as 3:2024cv05101
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loran White
Defendant:
Ed Troyer, Brent Bomkamp, Patti Jackson-Kidder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jackson v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Douglas V Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob M Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davies v. Reynoso et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Davies
Defendant:
Sgt. Reynoso, Sgt. Canela, Sgt. Coke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Jay Jackson v. Karim Rasheed
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Fred Jay Jackson
Defendant:
Karim Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Rasheed
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Fred Jay Jackson
Defendant:
Karim Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeRemer v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Ross DeRemer
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
