Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
Hedgpeth, Soto, Hamilin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hedgpeth
as 1:2008cv00134
Petitioner:
James E. Smith
Respondent:
Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. The Department of Corections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2007cv01745
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
The Department of Corections and Rehabilitation and Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Garza
as 1:2007cv01744
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2007cv01669
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Grannis
as 1:2007cv01519
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The United States Government et al
as 1:2007cv01431
Petitioner:
James E. Smith
Respondent:
The United States Government and Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Saldamando et al
as 1:2007cv00532
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
Alex Saldamando, D Feinberg, - Galaza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00510
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2007cv00463
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith
Defendant:
Martin J Jenkins, Department of Justice and Warden of K.V.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
