Cases 61 - 70 of 361
Goodrum v. Churchill County Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00540
Defendant:
John Scott, Churchill County Detention Center, Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Floyd et al v. Pittsburgh Bureau of Police et al
as 2:2020cv05153
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Governor Tom Wolf and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, Frederick Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivers v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers and Juice Lee
Defendant:
San Diego County, Alessandra Serano and Vincent Bales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Zanotto v. Snake River Corr. Inst.
as 2:2020cv00854
Respondent:
Snake River Corr. Inst.
Petitioner:
Mattio Zanotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivers v. Becerra et al
as 4:2020cv00863
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, San Diego County and Adam L. Braverman
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, San Diego County and Adam L. Braverman
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dean v. Dravis et al
as 2:2019cv02050
Defendant:
Hemphill Koltes, Clements Digiulio, Gulick Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKiernan v. Columbia River Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv02006
Plaintiff:
Brian McKiernan
Defendant:
Columbia River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hentz v. Snake River Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2019cv01651
Defendant:
K. Cox, Jane or John Doe, Mark Nooth and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Fred Hentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. English et al
as 3:2019cv01381
Defendant:
Alexisa James, John Sewell, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Wyatt Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
