Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Meraz v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alex Meraz
Defendant:
Roger A Nelson, Mary E White, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Harrison v. USA, et al
as 22-15038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A. ASH, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson, DE GUZMAN, First name unknown, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson and others
Harrison v. Ash et al
as 4:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Richard Unger, Unknown De Guzman, A Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benge v. Wexford Health et al
as 2:2019cv01187
Defendant:
Lawrence Ende, Dorothy Igwe, S Riaz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Benge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 4:2018cv04048
Defendant:
Medina, Scott Kirkpatrick, Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 1:2018cv04048
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Defendant:
Carlos Bolanos, Scott Kirkpatrick, Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2015cv05820
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Walker
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Matthew Freeman, Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Harris et al
as 4:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
A W Harris, Unknown Nava, Unknown Johannes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maisano v. De Guzman et al
as 4:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Armondo V De Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maisano v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
as 4:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Armondo V De Guzman, Kevin S Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
