Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Singleton et al v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05392
Defendant:
Shannon Paris, NaphCare Inc, Chanelle Hackney and others
Plaintiff:
Dalynne Singleton, Rosie Monahan, Keith Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Eastman v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osirio #307582 v. Dennis et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rae Osirio, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Dennis, D Dowling, Hayden Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Eastman v. State of CA et al
as 2:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Defendant:
State of California, Amador County, City of Ione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gale v. Eastman
as 1:2022cv01741
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cody Gale
Defendant:
Joshua J. Eastman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Eastman et al
as 2:2021cv01130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric Hunt
Defendant:
David Eastman, Dept. of Child Support and Jennifer Boros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jeffrey T. Eastman v. Westbrook et al
as 1:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rodd Eastman and Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Defendant:
Well Path Medical, Public Safety Center and Robert B. Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Eastman v. Tuolumne County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv01303
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail and Dr. Sun
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Eastman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Eastman v. Covello
as 2:2020cv01725
Petitioner:
David K. Eastman
Respondent:
Unknown and Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Demisi v. Phan et al
as 2:2020cv01692
Defendant:
Ernaga, Kashif Ali, Myra Ladista and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Khalid Demisi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
