Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Poti v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2020cv02522
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Long Term Disability Coverage for all Active Full-Time and Part-Time Employees, other than those Classified by the Employer as Pilots, who are U.S. Residents and whose total annual cash Compensation i
Plaintiff:
Fiaola Poti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sysco Riverside, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local No. 495 et al
as 5:2019cv01352
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local No. 683, Does 1 through 50 being fictitious names of persons whose true names are otherwise unknown to the plaintiff, but who the persons assembled at or near the premises of Sysco Riverside, Inc.'s facility in Riverside, California, whose names will be added and International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local No. 495
Plaintiff:
Sysco Riveside, Inc. and Sysco Riverside, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
David Bozell v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2019cv00805
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America, THE LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES WHO ARE COVERED BY A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BETWEEN THE EMPLOYER AND THE FOLLOWING LOCALS: 14,110J, 120M, 120W, 135, 145, 1691C, 200, 264B, 399, 470 and The Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Who Are Covered By a Collective Bargaining Between the Employer and the Following Locals
Plaintiff:
David Bozell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Machell Brookens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 8:2016cv02016
Plaintiff:
Machell Brookens
Defendant:
Does, Supermedia Inc. Long Term Disability Coverage for All Part-Time and Full-time Employees who are not covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement Between the Employer and a Union and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
