Cases 101 - 110 of 4,919
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Singh v. Garland
as 24-3827
Petitioner:
HARINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
BMO Bank N.A. v. GSK Transport Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01753
Defendant:
GSK Transport Inc. and Gagandeep Singh
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3801
Petitioner:
SUKHVINDER SINGH, MANDEEP KAUR SINGH and NIRVAER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Floyd et al v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv03681
Cross-Defendant:
S.R. Smith LLC and Hyatt Corporation
Cross-Complainant:
S.R. Smith LLC and Hyatt Corporation
Defendant:
S.R. Smith LLC, Rajwinder S. Khosa, Hyatt Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda C. Floyd and Justin B. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GS Holistic, LLC v. Jeet Retail Inc et al
as 5:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Kuljit Singh and Jeet Retail Inc doing business as Smokers 1st Choice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
BMO Bank N.A. v. H&R Transport, et al.
as 1:2024cv00710
Defendant:
H&R Transport and Harmandeep Singh Gill
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kaur, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3713
Petitioner:
RAMANDIP KAUR and KUNWARPARTAP SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Grewal v. Garland
as 24-3688
Petitioner:
HARJOT SINGH GREWAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
