Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Knife Rights, Inc. et al v. Bonta et al
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Knife Rights, Inc., Eliot Kaagan, Jim Miller and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Kelly Martinez and Summer Stephan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Safari Club International, et al v. Rob Bonta
as 23-15199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, an Arizona nonprofit corporation, UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, an Ohio nonprofit corporation and CONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
United States v. Semenza II et al
as 2:2022cv02059
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Semenza II, Romie Semenza, Tesla, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Eyre et al v. Rosenblum et al
as 3:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Katerina B Eyre, Tim Freeman, Mazama Sporting Goods and others
Defendant:
Ellen F Rosenblum, Terri Davie and Oregon Hunters Association
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Junior Sports Magazines Inc., et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 22-56090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNIOR SPORTS MAGAZINES INC., RAYMOND BROWN, CALIFORNIA YOUTH SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and DOES 1 - 10
Amicus Curiae:
SECOND AMENDMENT LAW CENTER, JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARM OWNERSHIP and CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc. et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Oregon Firearms Federation, Inc., Brad Lohrey, Adam Johnson and others
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon State Shooting Association, Mazama Sporting Goods, Tim Freeman and others
Amicus Curiae:
Oregon Hunters Association, Gun Owners of America Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Terri Davie and Ellen F Rosenblum
Intervenor Defendant:
Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estados Unidos Mexicanos v. Diamondback Shooting Sports Incorporated et al
as 4:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Defendant:
Diamondback Shooting Sports Incorporated, SNG Tactical LLC, Loan Prairie LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Hub and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Junior Sports Magazines Inc., et al v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70185
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUNIOR SPORTS MAGAZINES INC., RAYMOND BROWN, CALIFORNIA YOUTH SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Petitioner:
JUNIOR SPORTS MAGAZINES INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Junior Sports Magazines Inc. et al v. Rob Bonta et al
as 2:2022cv04663
Plaintiff:
Junior Sports Magazines Inc., Raymond Brown, California Youth Shooting Sports Association, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
