Cases 11 - 20 of 1,111
Lover-El v. Kroger Food 4 Less
as 24-4007
Plaintiff:
EL'ESTRO LOVER-EL, Alfonso Soliz-Perez-El Jr. and Alfonso Solis-Perez-El Jr.
Defendant:
KROGER FOOD 4 LESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024at00495
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Jason Schultz and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Jason Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Segundo-Tapia v. Garland
as 24-3351
Petitioner:
VICTOR ALFONSO SEGUNDO-TAPIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-3273
Petitioner:
EDUARDO ALFONSO HERRERA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
