Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 68
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant: Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Satoshi Okubo
Respondent: Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party: Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.
as 3:2021mc80241
In Re: Pacific Agri-Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: In Re: Subpoena to Pacific Agri-Products, Inc. and Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16291
Not Classified By Court: In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Appellant: CONNER ERWIN
Defendant / Appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 21-15022
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In Re: Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2020mc00310
Petitioner: Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchasers
Respondent: Golden State Foods Corp.
In Re: Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Shinyei Technology Co., Ltd., et al
as 20-80157
Petitioner: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Respondent: TAITSU CORPORATION, SHINYEI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and SHINYEI CAPACITOR CO., LTD.
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16686
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: DAVID N. WATSON, JESSICA M. MCINTYRE, ERIC R. COGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16685
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16691
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN HARRELSON, WALKER, WARREN & WATKINS, LLC, DONNA MUCCINO and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?