Cases 11 - 20 of 62,943
J.G. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv06723
Defendant:
ByteDance, Ltd, Instagram, LLC, Snap Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
J.G. and Z. J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Freda v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01614
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Stephanie Harmon, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Freda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Doerer
as 3:2024cv06653
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Petitioner:
Anthony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cantu v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Cantu
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pelletier et al v. Chatterley et al
as 9:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Mineral County, Kendra Chatterley, John Does 110 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Pelletier and Deborah J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks #056530 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Defendant:
Unknown Grant, Unknown Party, Unknown Pacheco and others
Plaintiff:
John J Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. Walker et al
as 2:2024cv02546
Defendant:
Unknown Martin, Unknown Krugen, Brent Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Melinda G Valenzuela and Quennel D Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
