Cases 21 - 28 of 28
George Hallak et al v. L3 Communications Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00794
Plaintiff:
Firas Matti, Feras Matti, Karwan Sadi and others
Defendant:
L3 Communications Corporation, L3 Communications Holdings, Inc., Titan Translators and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fahman Saleh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70233
Petitioner:
FAHMAN SAEED OBAID SALEH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
George Hallak, et al v. TCS Corporation
as 10-56231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE HALLAK, an individual, ZHANGAR SOFY, DIA ALDIN and others
Defendant:
L3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP., a corporation, L3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. and TITAN TRANSLATORS, a corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
TCS CORPORATION, a corporation
George Hallak, et al v. L3 Communications Corp., et al
as 10-56173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE HALLAK, an individual, ZHANGAR SOFY, DIA ALDIN and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEJAR MAYI
Defendant - Appellant:
L3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP., a corporation, L3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. and TITAN TRANSLATORS, a corporation
Defendant:
TCS CORPORATION, a corporation
George Hallak, et al v. L3 Communications Corp., et al
as 10-56100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HALLAK, an individual, ZHANGAR SOFY, KHILAT MOHAMMED AGID and others
Defendant - Appellee:
L3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP., a corporation, L3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., TITAN TRANSLATORS, a corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
