Cases 41 - 50 of 5,769
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LIU et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv02041
Defendant:
Los Angeles Asylum Office, UR M JADDOU, David Radel and others
Plaintiff:
JUNHE TAN, RUIYING LIU, JUNZHE TAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. Garland
as 3:2024cv06577
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Lakhvinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02548
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Hina Sandhu and Jagteshpal Singh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
