Cases 51 - 60 of 137
EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00598
Defendant:
Andrew I Sealfon, Repro-Med Systems, Inc. and Repro-Med Systems, Inc. Doing business as RMS Medical Products
Plaintiff:
Emed Technologies Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Judge T John Ward
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04279
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lisa Friedman v. Jillian Michaels et al
as 2:2018cv09414
Defendant:
Jillian Michaels, EM Digital, LLC, Empowered Media, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
E-Go Bike LLC v. Rack 'Em et al
as 3:2018cv05590
Defendant:
Rack 'Em, Rack'Em Mfg, LLC, John Pallay, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
E-Go Bike LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BKK Working Group v. 1700 Santa Fe Ltd et al
as 2:2018cv05810
Defendant:
A.C. Barrel & Drum, A.J. Daw Printing Ink Corp., A.D. Service Publications and others
Plaintiff:
BKK Working Group, Rohr, Inc., California Resources Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Sacramento Regional Public Safety Communications Center v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01792
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Regional Public Safety Communications Center and Sacramento Regional Public Safety Communications Center Doing business as Sacramento Regional Fire/EMS Communications Center
Defendant:
Tyler Technologies, Inc. and New World Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
