Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Dale Harrison v. R P Guttierrez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06368
Respondent: R P Guttierrez and United States Parole Commission
Petitioner: Dale Harrison
Darrell Parks v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72120
: In re: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Petitioner: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: ISAAC FULWOOD, Jr., PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and PAUL R.A. HOWARD, Examiner, United States Parole Commission
Perla Cervantes v. USPC
as 12-71154
Petitioner: PERLA CERVANTES
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Maria Cervantes v. USPC
as 12-71155
Petitioner: MARIA CERVANTES
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Michael DeVaughn v. USPC
as 12-55329
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Roy Roybal v. S. Holincik, et al
as 12-55257
Petitioner - Appellant: ROY ROYBAL
Respondent - Appellee: S. A. HOLINCIK, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
John Paul Morrow et al v. United States Parole Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00700
Defendant: Patricia K. Cushwa, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Cranston J Mitchell and others
Plaintiff: Christian Davis and John Paul Morrow
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15039
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05613
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Poindexter v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00123
Petitioner: Joseph Edward Poindexter
Respondent: Craig Apker, United States Parole Commission, Lee Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?