Cases 71 - 80 of 250
Rico v. Ducart et al
as 3:2019cv04713
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, Sergeant B Ramsey, Associate Warden G. W. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Allergan Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00298
Defendant:
General Electric, Mentor Worldwide LLC., Allergan Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine E. Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03680
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Melton
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02454
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michael Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shawn Frost, Sr. v. J. Hallock, et al
as 19-15674
Defendant / Appellee:
D. MELTON, Correctional Counselor, A. BOND, Appeals Coordinator, CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
R. E. BARNES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN KEVIN FROST, Sr.
The Estate of Gertrude Melton v. Indian Health Services et al
as 3:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Manniilaq Associations, Maniilaq Health Center and Indian Health Services
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Gertrude Melton
Martin v. Trump et al
as 3:2018cv02677
Defendant:
Sheriff B. Gore, IGI Correctional Officer Salas, Head Psychiatrist S. Ba rho and others
Plaintiff:
Lance R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Martinez v. Patton et al
as 3:2018cv03480
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant:
B. Patton, D. Melton and C. Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohea v. Ducart et al
as 3:2018cv03349
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
C. E. Ducart, S. Curtis, D. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarmaal Smith v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 18-15532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARMAAL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, D. MELTON, J. LAWRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
