Cases 81 - 90 of 4,919
Buendia v. Singh et al
as 3:2024cv08135
Defendant:
Harpreet Singh, Unknown Parties and Fateh Trans Carrier Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jamison Buendia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BMO Bank N.A. v. Chahal Roadlines Inc et al
as 1:2024at00529
Defendant:
Chahal Roadlines Inc and Malkit Singh
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Bank N.A. v. Chahal Roadlines Inc, et al.
as 1:2024cv00788
Defendant:
Chahal Roadlines Inc and Malkit Singh
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01872
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05547
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bio-Synergy Environmental, LLC v. AK Freight Lines, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv01090
Defendant:
Speciality Insurance Company, Khan Tranz, Inc., AK Freight Lines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bio-Synergy Environmental, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Punia v. Garland
as 24-4042
Petitioner:
LABH SINGH PUNIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Adobe Inc.
as 3:2024cv03980
Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vikram Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
