Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Daniels v. Kotek et al
as 2:2024cv01538
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Downs, Tina Kotek and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Morrisey O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv01496
Defendant:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamont Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis, Jr. v. Safeway, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Safeway Inc. and Safeway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hildebrandt et al v. Lovik et al
as 6:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Cody Dean Hildebrandt, Jefferson Warren Davis and Tylor Setzer
Defendant:
Tina Lovik and Mark Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zachary Harper
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, N.P.M. Davies, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
