Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Eric Eleson v. State of Hawaii
as 20-16106
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC RICHARD ELESON
Eleson v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00179
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Petitioner:
Eric Richard Eleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Eleson v. Joe Lizarraga, et al
as 19-17435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC RICHARD ELESON
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ and JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden
Eric Eleson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-17150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC RICHARD ELESON
Defendant / Appellee:
NATALIE FRANSHAM, Head of Standardized Procedures Unit and SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR
(PC) Eleson v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2019cv00112
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Eleson
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz and Joe A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Eleson v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Eleson
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz and Joe A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Eleson v. Kernan et al
as 2:2018cv02834
Plaintiff:
Eric Richard Eleson
Defendant:
Natalie Fransham and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Hawaii v. Trump
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant:
Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
(HC) Eleson v. Kernan
as 2:2018cv02074
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Eric Richard Eleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Schanz et al
as 2:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
Shanna Green
Defendant:
Eric Richard Schanz and Peggy Schanz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
