Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Federal Trade Commission v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv01112
Respondent:
MGM Resorts International
Petitioner:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
H. v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01041
Defendant:
Wynn Resorts Limited, Wynn Resorts Finance, LLC, Wynn Las Vegas, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
A. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cartagenova et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv00999
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Plaintiff:
Stephanie McWilliams, Mari Cartagenova, Thomas Sakowych and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00998
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International and Jasper ko
Plaintiff:
Mari Cartagenova, Thomas Sakowych and Stephanie McWilliams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Lassoff et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv00995
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Plaintiff:
Saul Lassoff and Shirley Lassoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
D. v. MGM Resorts International et al
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Tyla D.
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International, Mandalay Resort Group LLC, MGM Grand Hotel LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
