Cases 1 - 10 of 2,009
Peterson v. Snap Inc.
as 4:2024cv06499
Defendant:
Snap Inc.
Plaintiff:
Georgia Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PS) Toepfer et al v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Pam Nelson, Robert Toepfer, Joan Alford and others
Defendant:
Dale Matsuoka, Natalie Peterson, Golden Boy Security Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson v. Copper Ridge Equine LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Megan A Peterson
Defendant:
Justin McCormick, Copper Ridge Equine LLC and Christine Shields
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Bonilla v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv02338
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson v. Turner
as 3:2024cv05697
Defendant:
Joseph Turner
Plaintiff:
Kurt S Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Christopher M. Peterson v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv07004
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Bonilla v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Christopher Peterson v. Sunday Swagger LLC
as 8:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
Sunday Swagger LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
