Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ASM Capital, LP et al v. Okun et al
as 4:2011cv04825
Plaintiff:
ASM Capital, LP , Janet Furman Bowman , Robert J. Bruno and others
Defendant:
Edward H. Okun, Silicon Valley Law Group , Cordell Funding, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ASM Capital, LP et al v. Okun et al
as 3:2011cv04825
Plaintiff:
ASM Capital, LP , Janet Furman Bowman , Robert J. Bruno and others
Defendant:
Edward H. Okun, Silicon Valley Law Group, Cordell Funding, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams v. Mumtaz et al
as 5:2010cv02715
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Tabbaa Mumtaz, N. Kushner, Robin Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 5:2009cv02079
Plaintiff:
Anita Hunter, Anita Hunter, Anita Hunter and others
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., Countrywide Bank, FSB, Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hunter et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2009cv02079
Defendant:
United Western Bank, Bank of America Corporation a North Carolina corporation doing business as Bank of America National Association, Cordell Consultants Inc. Money Purchase Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Celltex Site Services, LTD, Quirk Infiniti, Inc., Grande Investment LLC and others
Interested Party:
ASM Capital, L.P. and ASM Capital III, L.P.
Trustee:
Gerard A McHale, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
Michael S. Devorkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Robin Rodriguez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2007cv02644
Plaintiff:
Robin Rodriguez and Robin Rodriguez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Curtis Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
