Cases 1 - 10 of 4,969
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Langenderfer v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv06526
Defendant:
Roger A. Miller, Nicholos Lumbreras and Thomas J. Madden
Plaintiff:
Thomas Langenderfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
(PS) Rogers v. Valdez
as 2:2024cv02506
Defendant:
Moses Valdez
Plaintiff:
Nicole Jean Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rogers v. Schwarz et al
as 2:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
Harrison Rogers
Defendant:
Unknown Schwarz, Kirt Finley, Jonathan Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lapin et al v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2024cv01552
Defendant:
John G Connors, Nike, Inc., Maria Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lapin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grogan v. Archwell Holdings LLC, et al
as 3:2024cv01618
Defendant:
John Hillman, Justin Bradley Roberts, Christopher M. George and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Grogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Darol Smith et al
as 5:2024cv01929
Defendant:
Roger French, Darol Smith and Michele Smith
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Ejectment
David P. Rogers v. California Behavioral Health et al
as 5:2024cv01892
Defendant:
CHCF Stockton California, US Attorney General, California Behavioral Health and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
