Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Collins v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00468
Defendant:
Captain, Sgt. Moore, Lt. Gartland and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Leroy Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Defendant:
Adrienne Givens and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Givens v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
John Henry Givens
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Darryl Elton Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Antonio McClain, Corrections Officer Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hamilton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kim Thomas, Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Patrick Nichols, David Blietz, Nell Motley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Schofield v. Givens et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smiley v. Givens et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Darren Lavon Smiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
