Cases 1 - 10 of 10,863
Canedo Avena v. Neely
as 7:2024cv01292
Petitioner:
Yomara N Canedo Avena
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dennis v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Dana Dennis
Defendant:
City of Pell City, City of Ashville, Jeanie C Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Painter v. Mckenzie et al
as 6:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Painter
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Alabama and Denice Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newsome v. US Marshall Services et al
as 7:2024cv01287
Defendant:
The Federal Republic of Germany and US Marshall Services
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Todd Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Jefferson County Clerks Office et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Preston Kennedy Lee
Defendant:
Jacqueline Anderson Smith and Jefferson County Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Shaffer et al
as 4:2024cv00988
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of ALabama and Scotty Shaffer
Petitioner:
David P Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Burton et al
as 4:2024cv01263
Petitioner:
Gary Allen Burton
Defendant:
Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Warden
as 7:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Melvina L. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casey v. Terry et al
as 3:2024cv01260
Defendant:
NAPH Care, David Terry, Thomas Freese and others
Plaintiff:
Quintus Bernard Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
