Cases 61 - 70 of 354
Martin et al v. Apple Inc
as 3:2021cv00977
Plaintiff:
Brian Martin, Theresa Hall, Donna Martin Parker and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Kendrick et al v. Apple Inc
as 4:2021cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kim Kendrick, Brianna Kruz Smith, Cassandra White and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Kern et al
as 6:2021cv00779
Defendant:
Donald Kern, Grace, Quality Health Care and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collings v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00655
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Mitchell Scott Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pre-Emptive Health Solutions et al
as 6:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Roger Childers and Pre-Emptive Health Solutions
Plaintiff:
Hollis Chadwick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collings et al v Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
James Dee Walker, Timothy Allen Jolley, Albertville City, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
J Monroe Johnson and Eujena Rogers Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garrison v. Medicredit, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger Garrison, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rogers v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00434
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health Inc doing business as Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Teva Women's Health LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ronda Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
