Cases 41 - 50 of 19,751
Edgmon v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 2:2024cv02117
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Plaintiff:
James Edgmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federman, PC v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv05191
Plaintiff:
William B. Federman, PC doing business as Federman & Sherwood
Defendant:
Riley Park, KAD Oncology Specialists, LLC. and Kathleen Sue Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
McLean v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05189
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shoeman et al v. Berry et al
as 3:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Rob Shoeman and Amanda Shoeman
Defendant:
Butch, Robert Berry, Terry Long and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ferrell et al v. Nixon et al
as 3:2024cv03038
Defendant:
Nick Knopic, John Ainsworth, David Nixon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ferrell and Brenda Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Miller County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv04095
Petitioner:
Dacorey Moss
Respondent:
Miller County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medcalf v. Evans
as 6:2024cv06120
Plaintiff:
William G Medcalf
Defendant:
Travis Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Tripp et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Kenderick Loray Sanders
Defendant:
Jailer Joseph Tripp, Jailer Tyler Poole and Jail Administrator Gene Segar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Denton
as 2:2024cv02116
Defendant:
Jamie Denise Denton and Jamie Denise Dewitt
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
