General Cases filed in the US District Court for the District of Arizona Before Judge Jennifer Guerin
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Romero v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00631
Petitioner: James Manual Romero
Respondent: Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00626
Petitioner: Abraan Rene Ortiz
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortega-Lopez v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00618
Petitioner: Alejandro Ortega-Lopez
Defendant: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beltran-Jimenez v. Keeton et al
as 4:2011cv00560
Petitioner: Jaime Beltran-Jimenez
Respondent: Charles Keeton, Corrections Corporation of America and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luna v. Graber
as 4:2011cv00524
Petitioner: Oscar Luna
Respondent: Conrad M Graber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00493
Petitioner: Herbert Walker, Jr.
Respondent: Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ridings v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00470
Petitioner: Joshua Michael Ridings
Respondent: Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcellus v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00412
Petitioner: Laurence Lee Marcellus
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Hartsuck et al
as 4:2011cv00396
Petitioner: Rene Orivel Sanchez
Respondent: Keith Hartsuck and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00355
Petitioner: Daniel Jesus Chavez
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?