Cases 31 - 40 of 24,325
Lamar Stevenson v. Fidencio N. Guzman
as 2:2024cv07533
Respondent:
Fidencio N. Guzman
Petitioner:
Lamar Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas Ed Buskirk v. Patrick Covello
as 5:2024cv01444
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ed Buskirk
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Dixon v. Cpt. Robinson
as 2:2024cv07368
Respondent:
Cpt. Robinson
Petitioner:
Frank Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector Castillo v. Fidencio Guzman
as 2:2024cv07496
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Petitioner:
Hector Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdirashid Haret v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01878
Petitioner:
Abdirashid Haret
Respondent:
J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hamidulah Sarwary v. Peggy Llamas
as 2:2024cv07469
Respondent:
Peggy Llamas
Petitioner:
Hamidulah Sarwary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donaldo Galaz v. People of The State of California
as 2:2024cv07517
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Petitioner:
Donaldo Galaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Emerson Norton v. Israel Jacquez
as 5:2024cv01852
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Glenvert Green v. Ricolcol
as 5:2024cv01874
Petitioner:
Glenvert Green, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jingyuan Li v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv07495
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jingyuan Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
