Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 111 - 116 of 116
Kenneth D. Dawson v. Arnold Swarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv02752
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Dawson
Defendant: Arnold Swarzenegger, Secretary of California Dept. of Corrections & Rehalibations, James Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
David L. Mojarro v. Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00541
Petitioner: David L. Mojarro
Respondent: Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Da Wen Yu v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 8:2008cv00194
Petitioner: Da Wen Yu
Respondent: Michael Mukasey, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and James T Hayes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa v. Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2008cv00336
Petitioner: Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa
Respondent: Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calvin Chee Keong Lee v. Secretary of the Army et al
as 5:2007cv01382
Petitioner: Calvin Chee Keong Lee, Calvin Chee Keong Lee and Calvin Chee Keong Lee
Respondent: Secretary of the Army and Commander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jose Brito-Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00181
Petitioner: Jose Brito-Lopez
Respondent: Alberto R Gonzales, Alberto R Gonzales, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?