Cases 1 - 10 of 201
(PC) DOE #8 v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv01130
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE #8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Doe #7 v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE #7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Beavers v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Beavers
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martin v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Raymond Martin
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin and Doe Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Doe #2 v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01844
Defendant:
Rusty Hickethier, Jeff Macomber, Marcus Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe # 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Pantoja et al v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024at00749
Plaintiff:
Amado Pantoja and Maria de Lourdes Vera
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffrey McComber and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Defendant:
Luis Gonzalez, Jeff Macomber, Rusty Hickethier and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024at00410
Plaintiff:
Jasmyne M. Austin
Defendant:
R Rodriguez, V Ramolete, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fisher v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Bradford v. Spangler et al
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Jane Doe, G. Spangler and Howard E. Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
