Cases 1 - 10 of 1,546
Jones v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Limited et al
as 2:2024cv02572
Defendant:
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Limited and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Tahoe Truckee Vacation Properties, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02560
Defendant:
Finest Luxury Enterprises, Inc and Tahoe Truckee Vacation Properties, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Combs v. Navarro et al
as 2:2024cv02576
Defendant:
T. Jones and F. Navarro
Plaintiff:
Andre Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, M. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McDonald v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv02545
Defendant:
Urrea, B. Chaves, Michels and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Penney OpCo, LLC
as 1:2024at00712
Plaintiff:
Ellen Jones
Defendant:
Penney OpCo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jones v. Penney OpCo, LLC
as 2:2024cv02468
Defendant:
Penney OpCo, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ellen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(HC) Kelly v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv02462
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Sgt. Tennis, Gena Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hickman v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Defendant:
Gena Jones and State of California
Plaintiff:
Kevin Duane Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kelly v. Jones, et al.
as 1:2024cv01063
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Sgt. Tennis, Officer Chinne and others
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
