Cases 61 - 70 of 8,129
Sammarro v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc
as 8:2024cv01375
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc
Pretrial Service:
Stacy Estes Yates
Plaintiff:
Estela Sammarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Misty Coleman v. Hamilton County, OH Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 24-3453
Plaintiff:
MISTY COLEMAN
Defendant:
LAUREN A. SLACK, Individually and in their capacity as an employee of NaphCare, Inc., TIMOTHY SCHOLZ, Individually and in their capacity as an employee of the Hamilton County Sheriffs Office, NAPHCARE, INC. and others
Anderson v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Paula Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Pretrial Service:
Stacy Estes Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Yates v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02839
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Donna Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Young v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Defendant:
Ofc. Bowens, Ofc. Sage, Ofc. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Randall Construction Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00960
Defendant:
Randall Merchant Solutions LLC, 3307 S. Clarcona, LLC, Randall Mechanical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Lorenzo Butts
as 24-6673
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORENZO BUTTS, a/k/a Lorenza Butts, a/k/a Lorenzo Butts, Jr.
TAYLOR v. EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
ALEXYS TAYLOR
Defendant:
EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. doing business as HEARTLAND ECSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Yates v. Krow
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Richard Yates
Respondent:
Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
