Cases 21 - 30 of 285
Federal Insurance Company v. Relypsa Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07735
Defendant:
Relypsa Inc., Vifor (International) AG, Vifor Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Lehmann v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
Mindy Lehmann
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer and others
C S Bio Co. et al v. Comerica Bank
as 3:2022cv05033
Plaintiff:
C S Bio Co. and CCS Management, LLC
Defendant:
Comerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wood v. Clement Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04785
Plaintiff:
Andrea C. Wood
Defendant:
Clement Holdings, LLC, FCI Lender Services, Inc., SGT Investments LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gennett v. Mercer et al
as 3:2022cv04450
Plaintiff:
Robert Gennett
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Francois P. Chadwick, Christopher Wendel and others
Gervat v. Mercer et al
as 3:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Hughes Gervat
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Volta, Inc., Francois P. Chadwick and others
Sanetel et al v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv02868
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sanetel and Vijayendra Gururaja
Defendant:
Steven J. Boyd, Todd C. Davis, Cezar Andrei Floroiu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
United States of America v. Shipman
as 4:2022cv01203
Defendant:
Steven C. Shipman also known as STEVEN CYRUS SHIPMAN doing business as American Repair Company and STEVEN CYRUS SHIPMAN
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Pang v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09720
Plaintiff:
Shang Pang
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H Schulman, John D. Rainey and others
Hughes v. Medina
as 3:2021cv09156
Plaintiff:
Carter Hughes
Defendant:
Jesse C Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
