Cases 11 - 20 of 147
Lupercio v. Attorney et al
as 4:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Defendant:
Attorney and Andrew Flier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Brown
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, Laura Eldridge, Dr. D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro-Cardenas v. Target Corporation
as 3:2022cv07244
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Navarro-Cardenas
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Umberger v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2022cv03280
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Umberger
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, Maraskeshia Smith, Rainer Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Skike v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2022cv03222
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, Municipal Corporation of Santa Rosa, Officer M.P. #497 and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Van Skike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bahena v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Esmeling Bahena
Defendant:
B. Ramirez and Sgt. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnard v. Navarro et al
as 4:2022cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kinnard
Defendant:
Steve Navarro, Ralph Rogers, Phil Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castellanos v. Zieve et al
as 4:2022cv02191
Plaintiff:
Maria Castellanos
Defendant:
Les Zieve, Kevin Harrigan, Jack Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lupercio v. Office of the Clerk of Court
as 5:2022cv01727
Petitioner:
Ramon Navarro Lupercio
Respondent:
Office of the Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro v. SmileDirectClub, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Arnold Navarro
Defendant:
SmileDirectClub, Inc., SmileDirectClub, LLC and Jeffrey Sulitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
