Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Teryaeva-Reed v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv03910
Defendant:
Melissa Rios-Marques, Colette S. Peters, Kathleen Tommey and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Coffman v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08646
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martha J. Demski, William W. Ericson and others
Tran v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08417
Plaintiff:
Tran Tran
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Neil F. Mcfarlane, David L. Mahoney and others
Ulricksen et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio corporation et al
as 3:2021cv06653
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Ulricksen, Shane Barlow, James A. Jones and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio corporation, William W. Turman and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Druzbik v. Went et al
as 3:2020cv02320
Defendant:
Mardi C. Dier, Richard A. King, Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Druzbik
Van Camp v. Went et al
as 3:2020cv01815
Defendant:
Went, Mardi C. Dier, Richard A. King and others
Plaintiff:
Van Camp and Patrick Van Camp
Morrison v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv07654
Defendant:
Lucy Shapiro, Ph.D., Michael W. Hunkapiller, Ph.D., Marshall L. Mohr and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morrison
Wang v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv07450
Defendant:
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc, Christian Henry, Lucy Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv06480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
