Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Luis v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
Morris Luis
Defendant:
County of San Diego , Case De Amparo , Does 1 through 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2017cv01486
Plaintiff:
Morris Luis
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Casa De Amparo, DOES 1 through 20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yang v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 3:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Sai Yang
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Fresno Drug Enforcement Administration, Banning Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jarvis v. Unknown
as 3:2016cv03137
Petitioner:
Terence L. Jarvis
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart et al v. San Diego Unified School District et al
as 3:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hart and Zina Williams
Defendant:
San Diego Unified School District , Jarvis Gresham , Bobbi Prevost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. ATF et al
as 3:2008cv01529
Petitioner:
James L Hines
Respondent:
ATF, DEA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Hines v. Jarvis et al
as 3:2008cv01170
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
Bart Jarvis, Barbara Nelson, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Pico et al
as 3:2007cv01831
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Greg Pico, Maureen Pelton, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hameed v. Tayebi et al
as 3:2007cv00680
Plaintiff:
Eamen Hameed
Defendant:
Massih Tayebi, Masood Tayebi, Thomas Munro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Reamer v. Wireless Facilities Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00626
Plaintiff:
Bruce Reamer
Defendant:
Wireless Facilities Inc, Eric M DeMarco, Scott Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
