Cases 1 - 10 of 64
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALDE v. KERI
as 4:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
PAUL WALDE
Defendant:
SHARON KERI and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUMZY v. DOE 1-19 et al
as 3:2023cv22581
Plaintiff:
ACQUINETTA LUMZY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-19 and JANE DOE 20-21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARR v. TATE et al
as 5:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICAH CARR
Defendant:
JOHN TATE, CITY of BONIFAY, ROGER YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. GLASS
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
MARK GLASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINK et al v. WELLPATH LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fink, Estate of Caleb D. Fink and DANIEL D FINK
Defendant:
WELLPATH LLC, ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Nurse John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D ROSEN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, HORNORABLE CHARLES T CANADY, HONORABLE JUAN FERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
