Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Echols v. Catoosa County et al
as 4:2011cv00288
Plaintiff: Eric Echols
Defendant: Catoosa County, Tim Deal, Stephen Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manomano v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Plaintiff: Ralph Manomano
Defendant: Ashley Bell, Steve Chronic, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcombe et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02955
Plaintiff: Mayme Holcombe and Jock Chandler
Defendant: Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Council v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02600
Plaintiff: Joyce A. Council
Defendant: Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registrations, Incorporated, et al. (MERS) , Washington Mutual Bank/JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Santiago v. Hotel Systems Pro, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02320
Plaintiff: Michael Santiago
Defendant: Hotel Systems Pro, LLC, Hotel Servicepro, LLC, Charles L. Carroll, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
EarthCam, Inc. v. OxBlue Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02278
Plaintiff: EarthCam, Inc.
Defendant: OxBlue Corporation , Chandler McCormack , John Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Chandler v. Johnson
as 4:2011cv00143
Plaintiff: Emory Steve Chandler
Defendant: Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chandler v. Johnson
as 1:2011cv01790
Plaintiff: Emory Steve Chandler
Defendant: Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Kennedy v. The United States Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03501
Plaintiff: Elisha Patti Kennedy
Defendant: The United States Inc., The State of Georgia Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?