Cases 1 - 10 of 10
General Produce, LLC v. Carden Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
General Produce, LLC
Defendant:
Carden Foods, Inc., Charles M. Carden, Jr. and David Scott Carden, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al v. Paschal et al
as 4:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Devin Ross Paschal, David Scott, FAF, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
David Scott
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Devin Ross Paschal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Williams et al v. Scott et al
as 1:2013cv03567
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams and Diosia Williams
Defendant:
David Scott , Cobb County District Attorney's Office , Cobb County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Scott et al
as 1:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams
Defendant:
David Scott, Georgia Economic Finance Authority/COI and Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franks v. Humphrey
as 2:2011cv00325
Petitioner:
David Scott Franks
Respondent:
Carl Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
Bob David Scott
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, David Savage, Bob Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reneau et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
David Scott Reneau and Evelyn Denise Reneau
Defendant:
Richard E Patterson, Richard E Patterson, R & D Trucking Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Type:
Torts - Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
