Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv02292
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sibley v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv02085
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Sibley
Defendant:
Cook County, City Of Markham, Markham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shuhaiber v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01371
Plaintiff:
Fadeel Shuhaiber
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, John Doe, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, A. Scales, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bealer v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv04908
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bealer
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez, Michael Lemke, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv02651
Plaintiff:
George Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #1 et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09052
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Patrick J. Fitzgerald, David Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv08148
Plaintiff:
Darrin Wright
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
