Cases 1 - 10 of 12
IN RE THE SUPERVISED ESTATE OF THOMAS W. WARD, DECEASED v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 4:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
In Re the Supervised Estate of THOMAS W. WARD, Deceased
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MEDIAK, LLC
as 4:2019cv00138
Defendant:
MEDIAK, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
FIRST HARRISON BANK v. MORMAN et al
as 4:2018cv00155
Defendant:
VIRGINIA S. MORMAN, CRAIG ALLEN DOME, MORMAN SOUTHARD, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FIRST HARRISON BANK
Counter Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRITZINGER
as 4:2018cv00121
Defendant:
MICAH A. FRITZINGER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
as 4:2017cv00209
Defendant:
SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEBB et al
as 1:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUSSELL M. WEBB, JR. and SUSAN E. WEBB
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENBO
as 4:2016cv00137
Defendant:
MONTE DENBO
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
USA v. WILLIAMS
as 4:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EVELYN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
HOCKETT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. HOCKETT and JUDY A. HOCKETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
BREWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
GREG A. BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
