Cases 1 - 10 of 1,749
McLain v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Shelby McLain
Defendant:
WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MCCLUSKY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MCCLUSKY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EVANS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA EVANS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF GLENN PAUL KOEHRING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CHUTE v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
JENNY CHUTE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
THORBECKE v. MOOR et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
LEO B. THORBECKE
Defendant:
Edward R. Moor and Moor Law Office, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
HALE et al v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH HALE, JR and LINDA D HALE
Defendant:
DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WINDERS v. OLSEN
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDERS
Defendant:
AMY OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BUIS et al v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
JAMES BUIS and ANGELA BUIS
Defendant:
LEONEL GONZALEZ and ROEHL TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
