Cases 1 - 10 of 3,340
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. BLACKBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
BLACKBURN, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. ODELL
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. HOOD
Defendant:
SAMUEL ODELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKMAN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
JAMERUS PARKMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REYNOLDS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
LANDIS J. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE and THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRINGTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
JUSTIN HERRINGTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
