Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Sarah Barker
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,331
HILL v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Defendant: S. VARGUS, DONALD EMERSON, S. OBI and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant: JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff: DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYER v. HUMPHRY et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Defendant: JULIE HUMPHRY and JEFFERSON CO. PROBATION
Plaintiff: ANTHONY GENE BOYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv01392
Defendant: MARYANNE WILKINSON, KELCE PENNINGTON, DALTON ALBRECHT and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENSON v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01373
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner: CHARLES A. BENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARAFONOV v. BURGESS
as 1:2024cv01363
Defendant: DUANE BURGESS
Plaintiff: ANDREI FARAFONOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv01366
Defendant: CHLOE WARGNY, DENNIS REAGLE, UNKNOWN MAINTENANCE STAFF and others
Plaintiff: GILBERT RAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant: JONES, CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES, VANDERVORT and others
Plaintiff: EARL D. WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. LANE
as 1:2024cv01337
Defendant: CHRIS LANE
Plaintiff: JOHN WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv01319
Defendant: CHARLES HOUCHINS, JASON ERNEST, JACOB PRATT and others
Plaintiff: GILBERT RAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?