Cases 31 - 40 of 75
DIGGS v. DOE
as 1:2015cv00965
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DIGGS
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAGE v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00745
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., JANE DOE, SGT. E DORM and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDRICK v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2015cv00045
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALONE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMM v. FAITH et al
as 4:2014cv00123
Defendant:
JAMES BIDDLE, SEAN CLEMONS, RODNEY ENGLERT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GENTRY et al v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Defendant:
OFFICER ATHERTON, JOHN/JANE DOE, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
TABITHA GENTRY, MICHAEL HERRON, VINCENT MINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THORNTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2014cv00036
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN 47801
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EVERLING v. RAGAINS et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. EVERLING
Defendant:
PATRICK RAGAINS, THOMAS BRODERICK, JAMES NAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIELDS v. CITY OF MARION et al
as 1:2013cv01624
Defendant:
MICHELLE CATTERSON, CITY OF MARION, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPELLMAN v. MISINIEC
as 1:2013cv01488
Defendant:
JANE DOE and SUE ANNE MISINIEC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. SPELLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
