Cases 31 - 40 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PFLEGAR
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS
Defendant:
PFLEGAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONGORA v. REGAL
as 1:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GONGORA
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv02080
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. QUARRIER et al
as 1:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
QUARRIER, KATHLEEN M. SIMONE, NANCY EVETTE SPURGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv01796
Petitioner:
THOMAS MYERS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, KELLI K. JENSEN, KELLY N. BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAJORS v. WABASH VALLEY CORR. FACILITY (I.D.O.C.)
as 2:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
DREW THOMAS MAJORS
Respondent:
WABASH VALLEY CORR. FACILITY (I.D.O.C.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
